GFC Ajaccio vs Nimes

Postponed game belonging to 19th rounds.

GFC lost important players in winter break but survived somehow. After being heavily defeated by Lorinent 1-4, they snatched a draw at home 1-1 vs Brest ( but Brest had plenty of chance to win this game) and won 2-0 at Quevilly after a good game overall. They played in 10 men for all 2nd half but took fully advantage of a silly mistake at the midle of the pitch to open the score on counter. Second goal came in injury time and Quevilly attack including with the GK. A win who increased the gap between them and relegation spot at 9 points. But do not be deceived by this result - was a win against a poor team. Striker Toure is suspended for red card seen vs Quevilly.

Nimes just finished couple of hours ago thier game from 22 rounds. Was a clear win 3-0 vs in form Chateauroux, a win who came after Chateauroux saw a red card. True is after Sarr saw red card for a criminal tackle, 5-6 mins after Traore should have been also red booked for another criminal tackle but escaped only with a yellow one. Even so, till the red card Nimes missed 3-4 huge chances to score. A well-deserved win for NImes who given the circumstances didn't pushed too much.

I think NImes will continue thier good run and will snatch another win against a team who main option is to defend well. With some strikers in great shape, Bozok, Alioui, Ripart, Thioub I don't see Nimes leaving Ajacccio without scoring a couple of goals. Back Nimes. gl

Unbeatable Odds

Play now Low margins & High limits

GFC Ajaccio vs Nimes prediction

Tip Bookmaker Odds * Stake Result
2 BetVictor 2.30 8 2-0 LOST (-8 units)
* Odds as of post published time and are subject to change.
+36 -8
Comments (2)
Vadim
I expect here a draw. Nimes has not have a draw for more than 20 games. It should come once.
01/23/2018 - 08:34
Samuel
With lose here,
01/23/2018 - 20:44
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)