Juventus vs Genoa by Mrgol

Pick based on Asian handicap. Not familiar with handicaps? Read our Asian handicap betting guide
Juventus
VS
Genoa
After yesterday win for Roma, became more imperative for Juvntus to win this match, to try - after a very bad season - to gain at least one place in Europa League.

And seems that Juventus can win today: after last weekend win at Roma - where most part of observer considered them surely losers - they regain in moral.

More, absence of Buffon - good replaced by Storari - and of other players seems no more so crucial.

For home teaam remain out more or less, same players of last week, Buffon, Del Piero, De Ceglie, Chiellini , Quagliarella, Iaquinta, Sissoko, Rinaudo and banned Grosso.

Genoa seems relaxed, maybe a little too early to play as the championship is already finished, because Genoa has only nine points over relegation zone.

But is a fact that they won only at home against Palermo in last five matches, drawing against Bologna, in match suspicious of "fixing", because this result was good for both teams.

In last round at home against Cagliari. they don't recover the disavantage of one goal scored against at 16° minute.

Finally, some important absence for this match as Criscito (def. 30 banned), Destro (striekr 5+9 2goals), Kucka (midf. 11), Veloso (midf. 16+3), Rafinha (def. 22+6 2 goals).

Maybe the many absence in Juventus'attack (DelPiero, Iaquinta, Quagliarella, etc.), could be a little disavantage for my bet, but are well balanced by the two important defenders - Rafinha and Criscito - out in Genoa and Juventus' players Matri and Krasic are showing to be in a good moment of form

You are invited to check more free previews and picks at my sponsor page!

$200 Bonus

Play now US Players are welcome
Advertisement
Pick Bookmaker Odds Stake Result
Juventus 10bet 2.19 8 3-2 PUSH (Stake return)
0 0
Comments (0)
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)