Leicester Tigers vs Saracens by Serialtips

Tip based on Asian handicap. Not familiar with handicaps? Read our Asian handicap betting guide
Rugby, England, Premiership


Final Round


The Saracens are the strong leader of the Premiership and have secured their first place since a while, now the team is focused on the next play-offs and also the final of the H-Cup, so for this match without stake, the staff chose to rest almost all the players of the usual group of 23, indeed only Hodgson, De Kock, Johnston, Taylor, George or Barrington are in the group, knowing that those guys are more substitute players than starters, so this is a team B even C which travels to Leicester with many young or unexperienced players.


Leicester is 3rd and sure to be on play-offs, now the team will try to secure its 3rd place in order to avoid those Saracens on play-offs, knowing that Saracens often took the advantage on Leicester last couple of years, so I think that the tigers prefer to play against Northampton than Sarries.


There are couple of key players who won't play this match such as Ben Youngs, Goneva or Dan Cole, but this is still a strong team who will play with english international players Tuilagi or Parling and also the big coming back of Croft who will start on the bench.


As I said, the Sarries often took the advantage on Leicester last couple of years, only 2 wins for Leicester on the last 10 meetings, there is a big rivalry between those 2 teams, so looking at the team who will play for Saracens, this is an unique opportunity for Leicester to win but also crush one of its big ennemy.


So, I think that Leicester will win this match by more than 12 points.

$200 Bonus

Play now US Players are welcome
Tip Bookmaker Odds * Stake Result
Leicester -12,5 Winner 1.90 8 31-27 LOST (-8 units)
* Odds as of post published time and are subject to change.
0 0
Comments (0)
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)