Gloucester vs Saracens by Serialtips

Pick based on Asian handicap. Not familiar with handicaps? Read our Asian handicap betting guide
Rugby, England, Premiership


Round 11


Gloucester is really disappointing this season, they are only 9th of the Premiership at the moment. They just beat the 2 last teams of the Premiership, but by a short margin, so I am not sure that it has erased the doubts in this team.


Moreover, there are many injuries since one month (Kalamafoni, Trinder, Savage, etc) so the headcoach is forced to put almost always the same players, it will be the case today so I won't be surprised if they feel tired during the match.


On the opposite side, this is the contrary for Saracens, they are great at the moment, strong leader of the Premiership before this round with 10 wins...for 1 loss.


The squad was rotated the last two matchs, some key players had the the chance to rest, and for this trip to Gloucester, the staff chose to put its best team possible in order to prepare the next important match in H-Cup.


So Saracens is taking very seriously this match with its best team and among the players, some are fresh, then I don't see how Gloucester can compete against this strong and confident team.


So, I think that Saracens will win the match, and I think that they can do it by more than 4 points.

$200 Bonus

Play now US Players are welcome
Pick Bookmaker Odds Stake Result
Saracens -4,5 Ladbrokes 1.91 8 8-29 WON (+7.28 units)
0 0
Comments (3)
I think Im going for a bigger margin even. Got all games right last night so made good cash there. Splash a bit today
01/04/2014 - 12:07
Hi Ruggaman, I preferred to secure with the "classic" handicap, even if I was expecting a bigger margin like you.

Which handicap did you take ?
01/04/2014 - 18:59
Waited for live betting as theres more handicaps then, and went with 15
01/04/2014 - 20:01
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)