West Indies vs Pakistan by Rahul

Shadab Khan the new young sensational leg spinner for Pakistan has already created a big impression to make his spot in the T20I squad as well as this current ODI squad; and has now made it into the test squad as well. Shadab showcased through the PSL that he is a force to be reckoned with. He had taken 19 wickets in 9 straight games in T20 cricket which is an average of 2 wickets per game. With that success achieved in only 4 overs; its scary to think how he will fair when he a full quota of 10 overs under his belt.

 

In his first debut game against West Indies in the first ODI, he managed to bowl a consistent line and length and only took a tonking in the final overs, which also got him his 2nd wicket. In his 2nd ODI game, he had bowled extremely well and had many balls passing the outside edge of the bat and also had a few LBW decisions that were extremely close. He has looked extremely unplayable so far in this series. I am expecting him to do well again especially if he will bowl in the death overs as the batsman are trying to slog against the turn.

 

What has also been key to his success in his short career is the number of dot balls he bowls which has kept his economy rate in check under 5 runs an over; with over 50% of his deliveries going as dot balls.

 

Shadab Khan is also a decent batsman in his own right averaging 26 with the bat in domestic level in one day games; which makes him an added asset to this team. My backing for this game is Shadab Khan over 39.5 Performance points.

 

For more tips, previews and subscription via email; visit http://www.topsportstips.org

$200 Bonus

Play now US Players are welcome
Advertisement
Pick Bookmaker Odds Stake Result
S Khan Over 39.5 Performance Points Bet365 1.72 8 Won WON (+5.76 units)
0 0
Comments (1)
Rahul
50 points from shadab khan!! Killed it!
04/12/2017 - 01:23
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)