Larcher de Brito vs Hlavackova by ReguLator

Nottingham 2016

 

Qualification Round

 

Larcher de Brito against the well known doubles player Hlavackova. One would expect from the Czech to perform good only on clay but she seems to be so versatile.

 

de Brito has a solid backhand and a very strong one so she will give trouble to the experienced, reaching over 30 finals in her career, Hlavackova.

 

Hitting hard on grass requires from the opponent to run more and Hlavackova may lack in this area.

 

I a do not feel very confident to choose a winner, though I think the Czech will win this one in a decider set.

 

My choice is Over 21.5 games with medium stakes. If we see a 7-5 or 7-6 then it could be done with 2 sets. But I can't see one of them winning 2-0

$200 Bonus

Play now US Players are welcome
Advertisement
Pick Bookmaker Odds * Stake Result
Over 21.5 games Bet365 1.83 6 31 games WON (+4.98 units)
* Odds as of post published time and are subject to change.
0 0
Comments (6)
Jonathan
I respect your time but this is a joke!!
Stop posting!
06/06/2016 - 12:46
john
stop posting??

he's the leading tipster this month so far...

got all tennis tips right too
06/06/2016 - 13:46
Jonathan
Ahaha. Now you will see why I tell this. He is a joke! First set 6-2
06/06/2016 - 15:45
gilles
I can only speak for myself, Jonathan, but at least I would take your comments more serious if you would give your reasons why you disagree instead of using words like 'joke', now you rather confuse me and waste my time tbh, and also mind afterwards is always easy talking as a punter, I would be a millionaire if I knew only a few outcomes, but I can't tell you what to do or not do
06/06/2016 - 16:15
Jonathan
I saw his posts. He comments like he is a tennis professional but he knows nothing. A wannabe!!
06/06/2016 - 16:24
bompas
another winning bet.

Jonathan? LOL
06/06/2016 - 17:22
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)