Challengers vs Gujarat Lions by Aditya9920

Bangalore are 3rd from the bottom on the IPL table and their recent wins against Pune and Punjab give them a lot of confidence, but the loss against MI again gave them a setback, with all the batsmen exccept Rahul failing miserably. They are struggling to make an impact with none of their bowlers able to replicate the magic in the absence of their stock bowlers Starc and Badree. They come back to Chinnaswamy, their favourite scoring ground and RCB has been very heavily dependent on batting given they have Kohli, ABD, Gayle (hopefully will be playing tomorrow) and Watto in their ranks.



I would like to place the bet on the player performance. I think the form Kohli is currently in it should be a cake walk for him scoring 35+ in each match and on a good batting track like Chinnaswamy and even a good bowling line up of Gujarat pretty average on this ground and I guess he will fancy his chances to score big.



His stats are just insane this year. A average of 110.33 in T20's, with 4 half centuries and 2 centuries in 9 matches of this IPL. This match is very very important to RCB and I'm sure he will be giving his best, as they can't afford to loose any. He scored only 20 and 7 in the previous 2 matches so expecting him to score big here.


For all of those who don't know how player performance works:



- 1 pt for each run scored in the match



- 20 pts for each wicket taken



- 10 pts for each catch taken



- 20 points for a stumping/runout



and finally the stakes would be refunded if player doesn't make the playing XI. I see Kohli scoring big in this match and expect him to take at least one or two catches.



All the Best.


Tip Bookmaker Odds * Stake Result
Player Performance - Virat Kohli 36 & Over Bet365 1.90 10 Won WON (+9 units)
* Odds as of post published time and are subject to change.
0 0
Comments (0)
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)