Redbergslids IK vs HK Drott by Bulan20

Match between RIK and Drott.


RIK is in great form and showed most recent vs Sävehof yet again a great defensive work. Had no trouble taking that win 22-28. They now have 3 straight wins against very tough opponents. Like mentioned in that prediction, Iveland is a defensive captain at the moment and Thulin did a solid work in the goal. Again it was good offensive production from different players, but with keyscorers Arnesson and Johansson scoring most with 6 each.


Drott has 1p in 17 matches. They at times have good offense but then poor defense and vice versa in other games. Have hard time playing solid on both ends. Some good material but overall a fragile squad. For this match longterm injured captain Adolfsson is back. A good 9m player but he hasn´t played consistent for 2 years and also been sick during last week so it is questionmark on how much he will be likely to contribute. Also Nilsson is out for this match.


A bit tricky with like mentioned a Drott that can have either a strong day in offense or in defense. RIK have done 28-29 goals lately vs way better teams so they can also run away and go over 30 goals if they have that day. Gonna go with under 26,5 goals in first half. Drott have gone under in 3/3 of their last matches scoring 10,7,10 goals. RIK have done 12,14,16 and gone under 2/3 last matches. Alingsås did 16 vs Drott when Drott only scored 7 and I think we can see something similar here. Even if Drott reach a more standard 10 goals it is below the line. Hopefully it is a very physical first half and with RIK not going too crazy in production, then I think this has a solid chance to stand. Under 26,5 goals in first half is the prediction.

$200 Bonus

Play now US Players are welcome
Pick Bookmaker Odds Stake Result
Under 26,5 goals in 1st half Unibet 1.83 7 12-10 WON (+5.81 units)
0 0
Comments (0)
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)