Ulsan Hyundai vs Jeonbuk by Mrgol

Ulsan-Hyundai
VS
Jeonbuk
Jeonbuk shuld win here, considering that they are first on table, while hosts are third from bottom with only mathematical chances to enter in championship group phase at five rounds to the end of regular season.

 

But i prefer to bet on match rich of goals, considering important absences ( in most aprt due to NT duties) at the back for both teams.

 

Hosts are without regular keeper Kim, other two keeper played only one match each other ( as regulars and one of them only 35 minutes) both ended with various goals scored by both teams ( one of them reverse fixture against Jeonbuk, final result 2-1 for Jeonbuk). Key def. Rim ( 22+2) with NT, too.

 

Also guests are without regular keeper Kwon. Substitute keeper Hong played only oen match in Augut ( 2-1 home defeat against Seoul. Jeonbuk also without def. Kim Ki ( 25) and Wilkinson ( 14), also out midf. Sung Lee ( 25 4g).

 

Jeonbuk will play Asian CL in next midweek, so could do a bit of rotation, considering also that they ahve nine points of advantage on second on table, while hosts have nothing to loose, so another reason to think in a match without a defensive tachtical approach.pin
Advertisement
Pick Bookmaker Odds * Stake Result
Over 2,5 goals Pinnacle 2.23 7 2-0 LOST (-7 units)
* Odds as of post published time and are subject to change.
0 0
Comments (5)
vish700
Good prediction. But I'm fancying goals over 2.5 as the best bet on this match. Ulsan is a an unpredictable team and goal scoring is not a problem at all. Goals will certainly be part of this match.
09/09/2015 - 11:55
BET
@Vish700, maybe I'm blind but I think its the same pick Mrgol's suggested!
09/09/2015 - 13:32
Hassy
lol
09/09/2015 - 16:03
albert
bad bad it is not coming
09/09/2015 - 16:04
BET
@Albert, that's the pressure you get when following awful tipsters :D
09/09/2015 - 17:09
Leave a comment

Name Please, no foreign characters (required)

E-mail (Will not appear online)

Comment (Your comment will be published once it has been approved by our moderators)